27. April 2010 by admin.

So, how would we live if we knew that we were transitional beings and that evolution was now in our hands?

Let’s look at what options are available to us.

1) We could accumulate more stuff. This is what a lot of us have done, right? And, if we are the conscious organ of a living universe, it should come as no surprise that accumulating more dead things to surround ourselves with doesn’t ultimately satisfy.

2) We could accumulate more experiences. Travel the world, climb mountains, sail the seas, try new things. This is perhaps a bit more interesting, but those of us who have done a lot of that also know that it doesn’t really ultimately satisfy our deepest longing. There’s something too passive about it. And also a bit too self-focused. Just taking it all in.

3) We could express our creativity. Take up painting, write the great American novel. This feels a bit warmer, right? At least it’s more generative, we’re participating in the creative unfolding. Which is why it is a more deeply satisfying experience than mere accumulation. But if the context of that creativity is mere self-expression for self-expression’s sake, again, it tends to fall short of the mark.

4) We could pour our energy into service, either helping those in need, or trying to save the environment. Now, if our goal is to become planetary citizens, this one clearly feels warmest of all. But, again, I would bring us to the question of context. What is the context in which we’re serving? Are we simply patching up holes in a sinking ship or are we building the Ark that will carry humanity forward on its evolutionary journey?

Perhaps what we need to be doing is using our powers of consciousness and creativity to help move evolution forward, consciously participating in the enlightenment of all manifestation. In a very real sense, humans are the growing edge of the big bang, of evolution as far as we know. And now, with our unique power of choice, we can consciously evolve. So, we need to do it—and fast.

So, what is conscious evolution? Is it still going to be biological evolution? Are we going to consciously grow a second set of arms to make us more productive? Or x-ray vision? Not any time soon. Biological evolution takes eons. No, with the human, evolution has now moved into the realm of culture and consciousness. And so, when I talk about moving evolution forward, that’s what I’m referring to. Evolving our own consciousness. Our interiors. And evolving culture.

So now what is consciousness? Perhaps the evolution of spirituality? This is a huge topic.

Apart from all of the social functions it has served, at the heart of religion has always been the mystical quest. Defined in many ways, at its essence is a belief that humans, as the conscious, aware part of the creation, have a potential for holiness, an immense transformative potential to become something extraordinary. And at the same time, we have an innate lower nature, call it original sin in Christianity or the five poisons in the East. And the goal of the spiritual path is to transcend our smallness, our lower nature, and become a pure reflection of the perfection of the Creator or the source of all that is.

And in light of our new understanding of evolution, I would like to modify that perspective a little. I would say that the traditions are correct that we do have an extraordinary, even cosmic potential that we are evolving toward. And we also have a “lower nature.” But that it probably wasn’t Adam and Eve’s fault. In an evolutionary context, we’ve come to understand that these are our inherited proclivities left over from our evolutionary past. Human beings evolved over long tracts of time when life was unimaginably different than it is today. Like it or not, we are saddled with programming that evolved over millions of years. We have a reptilian brain, a mammalian brain and a primate brain all hardwired with instincts that no longer serve us. Indeed, as a scan of any day’s news reveals, much of it is incredibly destructive to ourselves and others if allowed to express itself unabated. So, we have a lot of evolutionary baggage we need to overcome or transcend.

But the most important piece in terms of what it means to consciously evolve is that (1) we inherited a tendency toward short-term self-interest. And (2) we inherited an intense resistance to change. A fear of the new and unknown. Because from a perspective of survival, change meant risk of death. Have you ever noticed how hard it is to care about someone else when your own needs aren’t being met, or are being threatened? Have you ever noticed how hard it is to change?

And if we agree that the purpose of Life is to get on board with the evolution project, can you see how both of these tendencies are major obstacles in front of us?

If we’re going to be fit to be conscious agents of evolution, we need to:

1) transcend our resistance to change, our fear of the unknown, our rigidity of mind by becoming fluid, adaptable, flexible

2) transcend egocentrism and ethnocentrism, tribalism and nationalism to become true planetary citizens.

And, so, just as in the old religions, the highest calling was for a radical self-transcendence and purification so that we could know God directly, I think that in the new evolutionary spirituality, we also have a great mystical task before us as human beings.

(1) to face the reality of how primitive our current evolutionary stage is compared to where we can go. To face this both for the race as a whole and also to see it honestly in ourselves in all of its particulars.

(2) to give our hearts and souls to the deep spiritual work of rising above our lower nature.

(3) to stretch to think and feel, and most importantly act as global citizens. In all that we do to stretch beyond self-interest, tribal interest, regional interest, and national interest, to realize that evolution is seeking unification, and it is our job as conscious agents of evolution to help to bring that into being.

To be continued……

Posted in Links | 1 Comment »

22. April 2010 by admin.

Most of us have gotten on board with the idea of evolution by now. But, as with any new worldview, there are many holdovers from the old paradigm that remain intact. For instance, one holdover from flat-earth cosmology is the notion that when we look toward the night sky, we are looking up into the universe. We sort of imagine ourselves on a flat plane looking upward into the sky. Whereas it’s equally true that we could be looking down or out. Yet do you see how hard it is to imagine that right now we are on the bottom of the world looking down, pasted on by gravity?

Now, this holdover from the flat earth days doesn’t have any import. The fact that we still haven’t adjusted to the new paradigm in this way isn’t impacting how we live our lives. But, in the case of evolution, there is one holdover within all of us that is profoundly influencing the way we conceive of ourselves and how we relate to and live our lives. For although evolution as an idea is something we accept, we still tend to think of ourselves as static entities. You see, all creation myths the world over shared one thing in common. They imagine that the human was created fully formed. That we just showed up.

Therefore, deep in our psyche is the conviction that a human being is a fixed thing. That human beings have always been and will always be the same. When we think back a few thousand years to ancient Egypt we imagine they were people like us just in a more primitive context.

But this is not the case. Within a deep time context, we know that human beings grew out of other animals and emerged gradually over a series of small and large changes over millions of years. And that, even in the brief period that modern humans have been around, our experience of being alive has been developing and unfolding gradually as the dynamics of evolution moved into the realm of consciousness and culture. Even a few hundred years ago, the experience of being human was radically different. Developmental psychologists tell us that the sense of interiority, of self-awareness and introspection, and particularly the sense of being autonomous, self-authoring individuals able to choose and create our lives is an extremely new development. A person in the middle ages did not have a sense of self like we do.

The implications of this, if you really let them in, are profound. You see, what it means for us is that we are not static entities but transitional beings. The human is not a fixed thing but an unfolding process. We are on our way somewhere. We are not there yet. If you draw a line, an arrow of human evolution, let’s say a 100,000 year line starting with the emergence of the modern human roughly 50,000 years ago, where are we on that line? Right in the middle. Make it a 500,000 year line starting in the same place, and where are we? Just getting started. Make it a million year line . . .

To put this in a deep time perspective, if the history of the universe were being measured on a 24-hour clock, the human brain would have been around for about one minute.

Now, imagine humanity as a single human being in a process of development from infancy to old age. Looking at our overall behavior, where would you say we are on that developmental spectrum? We’ll go in reverse. How many would say “senior citizen”? How many would say “mature adult”? How many would say “adolescent”? How many would say “child”? Toddler? Infant? The typical answer is “adolescence.” What’s most interesting about the exercise is that when we put our attention there, we all know this about ourselves.

But have we really integrated this knowledge? Do we really live our lives in the knowledge that we are this adolescent species that is just getting started, and that we have a big job to do, which is to grow up?! Not usually. And why? Because from the beginning of time, we lived in a creationist worldview, and therefore are deeply conditioned to see ourselves as static.

So far, although I’ve said a lot, I’ve basically made two points. First is that we are the eyes of the universe, the reflective organ of the evolving whole. Second is that we are beings in transition, and are really just getting started at figuring out what we’re supposed to be doing here.

So, my question is: how would we live if we took these two truths to heart?

Now, before we look at some possible answers to this question, I want to point out that in terms of our current stage of evolution, it’s important to recognize that we are the first generation in history to have the luxury to ask them. Not only are we the first to really understand our place in the cosmos, but we’re the first to have the luxury to not be concerned with survival, and to actually have the freedom on a mass scale to think about higher things and consider what our larger role really is. We are at a unique moment in history.

To be continued……

Posted in Links | 1 Comment »

17. April 2010 by admin.

To go into a little more detail, to the best of our knowledge, 13.7 billion years ago, we were a singularity. Then out of nothing, the universe exploded into being. Out of an apparent nothing emerged a miraculous something. It only took about a million years for that initial firestorm to calm down, but from there, it began a stunning display of tireless creativity that has continued to unfold its miracle to this day. An amorphous cloud of hydrogen gas gradually coalesced into a hundred billion galaxies, which became perhaps the first artisans producing balls of hydrogen gas that began to burn with great intensity.Now, looking at it at the time, it probably all seemed rather meaningless, given that there was no one around to observe it anyway. But something very important was happening. Inside those primal stars, as they went supernova, the heat grew so intense that higher elements were born, like carbon and oxygen, and in these explosions which were as brilliant as the combined light of a billion stars, they scattered those elements across the galaxy. And out of those higher elements came the building blocks of a planet called Earth, which, in the blink of an eye begins to generate life. 4.6 billion years of Earth. 4 billion years of life.

The conditions for life were by no means inevitable. As it turns out, the universe appears to be set up in just such a way that life could exist. If any one of six basic constants or laws that define our universe were only slightly different, life would not be possible.

For example:

a) If the nuclear strong force were only slightly stronger (by as little as 1%) hydrogen would be rare in the universe, and elements heavier than iron would also be rare. If it were slightly weaker, hydrogen would be the only element in the universe.

b) If the nuclear weak force were only slightly larger, neutrons would decay more readily and be less available and no helium would have been produced by the Big Bang. If the nuclear weak force were only slightly smaller, the Big Bang would have burned most or all of the hydrogen into helium, for a subsequent overabundance of heavy elements made by stars, and life as we know it would not be possible.

c) If the nucleon to nucleon interaction were even .4% different, there would not be enough carbon in the universe for life as we know it to exist.

So, here you have this universe finely tuned for life, and then what happens? In what we might call the second big bang, the big bang of life, this dazzling display of creativity known as cosmic evolution morphs into an even more brilliant display of creativity in the form of biological evolution. From bacteria to plants to animals, this explosion of biological diversity gives rise to some 50 million different species.

Now, when we look at life, it also didn’t have to be this way. It’s feasible that we could have just accidentally gotten life and it would have remained at the bacterial level for eternity. But it didn’t. It has been a creative flowering of immense beauty and diversity. Now, one reason evolutionary theory has been knocked by religionists is that it seems to imply that it all unfolded randomly and meaninglessly. Some assert that evolution was a random event, and that if we were to rewind the tape back to the beginning and start over, the story would unfold very differently than it did this time.

It turns out that where biological evolution is concerned, some very particular developments were in the cards from the beginning. For instance, wings to fly evolved independently in flies, birds, pterosaurs and bats. The hydrostatic penis, which inflates through an infusion of fluid, evolved independently in mammals and turtles. Image-sensing eyes evolved independently 60 different times. And there are hundreds of other examples of traits that evolved independently. Given the fact that it followed certain progressions, we can be sure that we would have something very much like what we have now. So we can see that the laws of Life were set up such that the creativity of the Universe would evolve eyes to see itself one way or another.

So, this creative unfolding of life is trucking along for about 4 billion years. Then, about 4 million years ago, one of these creatures descended from trees, and stood up on two feet.

Now, initially, things didn’t speed up all that much. Our hands made tool use possible. But there was no flourishing of innovation. hominids made a number of the same stone tools over and over for a million and a half years. And the striking thing is that they just kept making it, without innovation.

And about 50,000 years ago, something dramatic occurs. The mind goes through a dramatic mutation. Some evolutionary scientists call it “The Mind’s Big Bang.” This is the moment when we start seeing dramatic artwork on the cave walls, ornate beads appear, people begin placing flowers on the dead. Human creativity is born, and with it the capacity to reflect on ourselves and our place in the Cosmos.

This is the birth of culture and with the advent of the human, the evolutionary dynamics that have been unfolding since time began suddenly to express themselves through the evolution of culture. From hunter-gatherer to agrarian to industrial to the information age, from the cave paintings to the pyramids to Shakespeare to rap music (Okay, maybe I should have left that one off the list). From family to clan to tribe to city to state to nation to global village (still working on that last one). From papyrus to the printing press to the telephone to the internet. From the hand axe to the plough to the crane. From the horse and buggy to the automobile to the space shuttle.

So, evolution has been on this upward spiral, first on a cosmological level, then on a biological level, then on a cultural level. And, if you step back and look at the broad sweeps, it is clear that it is heading in a very specific direction. Evolution moves in the direction of greater and greater cooperation and greater and greater complexity.

Cooperating groups of self-replicating molecular processes formed the first cells. Cooperating groups of individual cells formed larger and more complex cells. Groups of these cells combined to create the first multi-celled organisms. Groups of multi-celled organisms, like us, combined to form clans, then tribes and eventually societies. And those societies have continued to reach toward ever-widening circles of cooperation. Ultimately to the global village. We are on an arc toward Unity and complexity.

So, with the emergence of the human, something new is afoot under the sun. Not only does evolution move into the realm of culture, but with the advent of human consciousness, the universe has begun waking up to its own creative power. For the first time since that primordial fireball burst forth its light, the living universe has developed the eyes to look back in awe on its own unfolding. The miraculous evolutionary dynamics that created and continue to create the universe have now become conscious. And their name is? YOU. We are the conscious, reflective organ of the universe. And what’s more, we have now managed to look back to our beginnings and begin to understand the creative evolutionary dynamics that have been playing themselves out all along. And we’ve also even seen where they’re going. So, not only are we conscious, we know we’re conscious. Not only are we evolving; we know we’re evolving. And not only are we headed in a particular direction; we know which direction we’re headed.

So, from almost nothing came something, and the laws of that something were such that it would trend eternally in the direction of cooperation and unity. So, we are the conscious reflective organ of a living universe that is on a path toward greater cooperation and unity.

To be continued……

Posted in Links | 1 Comment »

12. April 2010 by admin.

Where are religion and spirituality headed at the dawn of the Third Millennium? Where is humanity headed, and the ultimate meaning of human life?

Here at the beginning of the 21^st century, we at the progressive edge of culture find ourselves in an interesting predicament. Never before in human history have we had so much complexity, uncertainty, and change to deal with.

Even a couple of generations ago, most of us knew our place in the world, what work we would do for our entire life, and had a kind of stability that we no longer have. Most of us will live in many different cities over the course of our lives and be recreating community and social relationships many times over. Half of us will get divorced and remarried. The nuclear family no longer provides a meaningful context for many of us. 50% of adults now live alone. Many of us only see our parents or children once a year. We are all dealing with unprecedented diversity in our workplaces, people with very different worldviews, beliefs, attitudes and preferences.

At the same time, the speed of technological change is requiring adaptability we’ve never known. Our Paleolithic ancestors used the same set of stone tools for 1.5 million years. And even 150 years ago, the technology was relatively static, with no significant changes to adapt to in a single lifetime, if anything changed at all. Unless you happened to be there for the invention of the plough or the printing press. But look at your own lifetime. How many new sets of tools have you had to adapt to? Look at the last five years. Most of us know that things are changing fast, but how many of us are aware that the rate of change itself is accelerating? This is a hard concept to get our minds around, but what techno-futurists call “The Singularity” is near. The honest truth is that we have no idea what the world will be like in ten or even five years. And before long, we’ll live in a world where we won’t know what it will be like next week. So, we are being stretched to develop a kind of flexibility and adaptability we’ve never known to be able to be resilient in the face of so much change.

We’re also confronted by global scale issues with global scale uncertainties attached to them. Overpopulation, modernization of the third world, terrorism, the potential for a worldwide epidemic, the rapid deterioration of the biosphere which sustains us. We’re being challenged by climate crisis (which is only the most visible iceberg tip of the environmental crisis) to consider some potentially radical lifestyle changes. We are being stretched to think and feel beyond ourselves, our families, and our communities. Humans have never had to think on a global scale before.

But the biggest challenge is that we’ve lost our collective compass. Religion used to tell us how to navigate life. But those of us who have close religious affinity are often left wanting because religions evolved in a different time, and are now challenged in their ability to adequately equip us to deal with the complexities of the lives we’re living. What prophet of the past, no matter how enlightened, could have told us how to relate to a global climate crisis?

To compound the issue, for most of us, the myths of the past no longer inspire us as reliable accounts of reality on which to base our lives. There has been a great shaking off of ancient dogmas that had two parts to it.

One was the Western Enlightenment, the scientific revolution. We realized we could understand reality directly, discern the Truth for ourselves without the mediation of the church. This marked what is known as “the Modern era” and this has allowed us to come out from under religious dogma. Freeing us from the idea of “private revelation” into one of “public revelation.”

Second was Postmodernism’s insight that even in our inquiry into truth, we are seeing through cultural lenses that may always be invisible to us. We are all biased, and even our science is operating under many presuppositions. This was the great death of Truth with a capital T, in the recognition that our capacity to Know is limited. We can never know everything.

Losing the dogmas of the past has been a good move. I’m glad that we now have the freedom to live our lives without kowtowing to a church hierarchy or needing to believe in a God defined as an old man with a white beard on a throne. In the absence of a unifying context, we’ve done a good job of finding ways to create our own personal meaning. But what many of us are discovering is that this freedom to think and feel and value as we please has come with a price. Because we have also lost, by and large, a larger unifying context for our lives. A unifying moral context. A unifying sense of meaning and purpose. A unifying myth.

Perhaps this is why so many of us feel a sense of fragmentation and isolation. In a world where truth is relative, meaning and purpose are subjective, we are all ultimately alone in our own universe.

In the midst of this great shaking off of religion, I feel that we have also, by and large, lost the sacred. How can we resurrect this sense of the sacred within a scientifically enlightened, post-mythic, postmodern world? How can we discover a unifying context of meaning and purpose? How can we find higher guidance for how to live our lives within the realm of public revelation?

Just because we no longer have a shared belief in a revealed “good book” to give a sense of meaning and purpose to our lives, do we have to leave the sacred behind? In our enlightened, scientific age, can we find a new myth that imbues life with a sense of higher meaning, of a meaning beyond ourselves, even beyond humanity itself? Or, more to the point, is there a story we can locate within a scientific worldview that is captivating enough, compelling enough, spiritual enough to magnetize us toward the highest human possibilities?

Now although it may be true that we cannot ultimately know everything, and we cannot be entirely certain that our filters aren’t distorting our perception of what’s “out there,” we have learned a lot in these last few hundred years of scientific inquiry that we can pretty much agree on. And, it is my opinion that, if we look at it closely, a profound pattern is starting to emerge that contains all the elements we need to begin to find a new, universal and even sacred context of meaning and purpose for human life. And that can also teach us a lot about how to live in the face of the chaos and uncertainty of modern life. That pattern, in a word, is evolution.

You see, when we step back from all of the sciences and social sciences, we see a similar picture: progressive development over time. What does this emerging knowledge of evolution tell us about the meaning and purpose of human life? And what does it tell us about how we should be living?

Indeed, if we take what’s known as a “Deep Time” perspective, and look at what has been unfolding for the last 13.7 billion years since the big bang, it starts to look like a great epic story of evolution that trumps any of the great epic creation stories the religions have given us. And what makes it all the more significant is that this story is not just one that was delivered to us by a prophet or the dream of a village elder. It’s based on what we’ve collectively been able to discern about reality through science.

So, what is this epic story? This new myth? Can it be summed up like this?: Take a great cloud of hydrogen gas and leave it alone, and it becomes rosebushes, giraffes, and humans.

To be continued……

Posted in Links | No Comments »

7. April 2010 by admin.

It goes something like this: “I’ve been on the spiritual path for years. I’ve meditated, gone to therapy, and attended dozens (if not hundreds) of workshops, seminars, satsangs, and retreats. I’ve had a lot of peak experiences. But, I’m still not fundamentally different from when I started. I’m still plagued by many of the same recurring negative patterns. I’m still not sure what I’m doing here. I’m still not deeply happy. I’m still not free.”

Why is it that so few of us get the results our spiritual practices are designed to deliver? How is it that after decades of earnest spiritual seeking, most of us ultimately settle for an attainment far less profound or dramatic than the one we were aiming for when we started on the path?

Is it, as some ancient eastern traditions tell us, that enlightenment is such a lofty goal that we should not expect to experience any radical transformation in one lifetime, but should instead see our current incarnation as but one of millions of baby steps toward that supreme attainment?

Or is it, as many contemporary teachers are fond of saying, that the attempt to change ourselves in any way is in fact misguided, that we should simply “accept what is,” “call off the search,” and realize that ordinary life, in all of its neurotic frailty, is enough?

With all due respect to those of differing opinion, I would like to propose another possibility.

I would like to suggest that the supreme and lofty goal of profound, life transforming spiritual liberation is not only possible in this lifetime, but is in fact well within reach of anyone of reasonably sound mind and stable character. And that the reason it is not happening for the vast majority of those who are seeking it is that, for most of us, our context is just too small.

Imagine for a moment that the fate of the entire human race rested on your shoulders alone. That humanity’s evolution out of brute self-interest depended entirely on your willingness to transform your consciousness, to rise above your smallness, purify yourself of negative conditioning, and become an exemplar of humanity’s highest potential for the world. Imagine, in other words, that for you, waking up from ignorance and self-centeredness became a moral issue.

Would you approach your path any differently? Would the energy you brought to your spiritual practice intensify? Would the quality of awareness and care with which you approached your interactions with others become more profound? Would you find yourself reaching with muscles you didn’t even know you had to be awake to the true context of your life? If you knew it all rested on you, would you have any choice but to change?

The Indian sage Ramana Maharshi once said that the spiritual aspirant must want liberation like a drowning man wants air. But the painful truth is that even when we recognize that we are drowning spiritually, most of us don’t care enough to struggle to keep our head above water. The challenges of the spiritual path are so immense that most of us will choose to continue suffering in our smallness over feeling the pain of allowing that smallness to die forever. But how many of us would do the same if we realized that it wasn’t only our own suffering we were perpetuating, but the suffering of the entire human race?

Now, you may be thinking to yourself, “That’s a nice thought experiment. Sure, it makes me realize I could be more earnest on my path, but what does it really have to do with me? I’m no megalomaniac. I know that my transformation alone isn’t enough to liberate the human race.”

And it is here that I would ask you to reconsider.

Modern science has in recent decades been verifying what the ancient traditions intuited long ago: that, in both tangible and mysterious ways, we are all interconnected, and any one of us can have a profound effect on the whole. And, if you accept the perennial mystical teaching that, at the level of consciousness, we are not only interconnected, but are actually one Self seeing through many eyes, then it should be clear that, like it or not, in the way we conduct our inner and outer lives, each of us is in fact always having an effect on the whole. Add to that the reality that we are evolving beings living in an evolving universe, that we are all part of a grand, cosmic evolutionary process, and the question of our obligation to the whole starts to cut close to the bone.

To reframe my earlier question: What would you do if you realized that the entire human endeavor, the evolution of consciousness itself, depended on your willingness to evolve your own consciousness? How would it affect the choices you make every day if you knew that those choices were, in a very real sense, either contributing to the evolution of the whole or holding it back? At this time when it seems that our very future depends on our willingness to evolve as a species, would you have any choice but to act in alignment with the greatest evolutionary good?

The point I’m trying to make is that when we take a closer look at what spiritual transformation is actually for, it quickly becomes clear that the path of transformation is not primarily about freeing ourselves from suffering and securing our own happiness. Sure, that’s a nice by-product. But, as long as that’s all we’re seeking, we probably won’t get very far.

Where the spiritual path really begins to get interesting is when we recognize that transforming ourselves in the deepest possible way is in fact an evolutionary imperative with profound consequences far beyond ourselves. When we begin to embrace the fact that our lives really are not our own to do with as we please, that in everything we do, we are in fact accountable to the Whole, something truly miraculous begins to happen. Faced with the palpable responsibility to transform for a greater good, we find that we suddenly have access to a seemingly infinite source of energy, intention, passion and courage to confront whatever challenges present themselves on our path. What’s more, all of the personal issues and problems, all of the fears and doubts and resistances that once seemed so insurmountable begin to seem a lot less significant. Why? Because our attention is now captivated by something much bigger than ourselves. Ignited by a noble calling to participate in the grand adventure of conscious evolution, we find we no longer have time to worry about ourselves. And in this freedom from self-concern, before long we discover that the deep inner peace and joy we were seeking all along has become the very ground we are walking on.

To be continued……

Posted in Links | 1 Comment »